Nairobi — The Pan African Forum has lauded the decision taken by the Kenya government to pull out of the maritime dispute with Somalia whose proceedings are set to kick off in The Hague on Monday.

Kenya has already written to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), to confirm that it will not be part of the proceedings, according to officials in the Attorney General’s office.

This is after the court rejected its plea to defer the matter.

“On behalf of Pan African Forum, I want to take this opportunity to thank the Kenya Government for not honouring the letter of ICJ dates for an oral hearing on Monday,” said Dr David Matsanga, the forum’s Chairman, “This is a great move for Africa.”

Matsanga said the case was flawed from the beginning when Somalia filed it under the pressure of Norway and Qatar.

“It is very clear that International agencies are loaded with corruption that makes it difficult for an African country to cope with,” he said, adding that “ICJ is crowded with Judges whose countries cannot be brought to the same court.”

“Why would an African nation surrender itself to such a theatre of absurd,” said Matsanga who had also written two letters to UN Secretary-General alerting him of the dangers of the court and the threat to Peace and Security in the Indian Ocean.

“Biased courts don’t deliver good rulings and therefore Somalia and Kenya can arbitrate outside such obnoxious institutions like ICJ,” he said.

Matsanga wrote to António Guterres in February, seeking his intervention to have the Kenya-Somalia maritime case at the ICJ deferred.In his letter, Matsanga said proceeding with the dispute at ICJ risks sparking fresh tensions and new conflicts in the region that is already volatile due to the shaky diplomatic relations between the two countries.

Somalia filed the case at the ICJ, seeking its intervention in defining its boundary with Kenya in the Indian Ocean, as laid down by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and other international sea laws.

“Mr Secretary-General we believe that any ruling at ICJ at any time about the maritime border dispute will spark a vicious war in a region where the conflict of Somalia still rages on,” Matsanga said in his letter to the UN boss.

The letter followed a decision by the ICJ rejecting Kenya’s bid to have the maritime delimitation in the Indian ocean case with Somalia postponed for the fourth time.

The matter was postponed for a third time in May due to the coronavirus pandemic.

“There are millions of Africans in East Africa and in the horn of Africa region who are worried about the Kenya/Somalia case at ICJ,” Matsanga told the UN in his letter, that also warned that “the world cannot afford another hostile region after the Libyan Mediterranean chaos that was caused by UN Security Council Resolution 1970 that dismembered Libya.

Matsanga said the tensions in the region were largely accelerated since President Mohamed Farmajo took over power, and has warned that the ICJ ruling if the maritime case proceeds, will worsen the situation.

“Farmajo seems to be in a predicament due to the undue pressure by external forces, namely Turkey, UAE and Qatar, Norway and to some extent France,” he said.

Kenya is among the countries contributing troops to Somalia under the AMISOM. “In fact, the situation is made worse when one considers that Kenya, through Amisom, is one of the reasons why Somalia has a semblance of stability,” Matsanga said.

The parties are seeking a resolution on the ownership of a 150,000 square-kilometer area off their Indian Ocean coastline, which both countries want to explore for oil, gas and fish.

Somalia filed the boundary delimitation dispute on August 28, 2014, staking a claim on an estimated 62,000 square miles oil-rich triangle in the Indian Ocean.

Mogadishu’s case is premised on Article 15 of the Convention of the Law of Sea adopted in 1982, Kenya saying the disputed area was in fact under its jurisdiction before the convention was enacted.